What has sold here
Every transfer the City has recorded against this lot since 2003 with a consideration above zero. A co-op apartment has no deed, so its sale is recorded as a Real Property Transfer Tax return instead; both are printed here and the instrument is named in the last column. The figure is the consideration as filed, which is not always the price a buyer would recognise.
| Recorded | Consideration | Unit | What transferred | Instrument |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Mar 2026 | $1,065,000 | PH-B | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 17 Jun 2024 | $680,000 | 6B | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 15 Sep 2022 | $600,000 | 11B | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 21 Mar 2022 | $580,000 | 7A | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 26 Sep 2019 | $458,000 | 2A | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 4 Oct 2018 | $575,000 | 9A | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 3 May 2018 | $738,000 | 7B | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 19 Jan 2018 | $630,000 | 7C | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 11 Jan 2017 | $197,014 | PH-A | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 20 Feb 2014 | $320,000 | 6C | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 2 Oct 2013 | $850,000 | PH-B | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 30 Apr 2013 | $499,000 | 10B | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 9 Apr 2007 | $415,000 | 11B | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 28 Feb 2007 | $438,000 | 2A | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 2 May 2006 | $443,000 | 8C | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 18 Apr 2006 | $490,000 | 10A | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 1 Nov 2005 | $465,000 | 6C | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
| 29 Oct 2004 | $350,000 | 2A | SINGLE RESIDENTIAL CONDO UNIT | DEED |
- DEED
- DEED. Conveys real property: a condominium apartment, or an entire building and the land under it.
By year
| Year | Transfers | Median recorded | Lowest | Highest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1 | $1,065,000 | - | - |
| 2024 | 1 | $680,000 | - | - |
| 2022 | 2 | $590,000 | $580,000 | $600,000 |
| 2019 | 1 | $458,000 | - | - |
| 2018 | 3 | $630,000 | $575,000 | $738,000 |
| 2017 | 1 | $197,014 | - | - |
| 2014 | 1 | $320,000 | - | - |
| 2013 | 2 | $674,500 | $499,000 | $850,000 |
| 2007 | 2 | $426,500 | $415,000 | $438,000 |
| 2006 | 2 | $466,500 | $443,000 | $490,000 |
| 2005 | 1 | $465,000 | - | - |
| 2004 | 1 | $350,000 | - | - |
The building on the lot
Section through the lot
Assessment
Assessed value is the figure the Department of Finance uses to levy property tax. For a class two building it is derived from an income approach and it is capped in how fast it can rise. It is not a market valuation and the two figures routinely differ by a wide margin. What the assessment does and does not tell you.
Classification and location
The Department of Finance building classification list does not publish a description for code RM. On this site that code appears almost only on condominium billing lots.
Other buildings in Chinatown-Two Bridges
| Address | Class | Res. units | Built | Transfers | Median apartment, 5 yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 225 CHERRY STREET | RM | 1,021 | 2015 | 640 | $1.97m |
| 265 CHERRY STREET | D6 | 490 | 1979 | 2 | - |
| 185 PARK ROW | D4 | 420 | 1960 | 262 | $718k |
| 275 SOUTH STREET | D6 | 256 | 1978 | 4 | - |
| 196 PARK ROW | D4 | 250 | 1965 | 148 | $870k |
| 82 RUTGERS SLIP | D9 | 198 | 1995 | 2 | - |
| 2 ELIZABETH STREET | R4 | 167 | 1985 | 111 | $685k |
| 80 RUTGERS SLIP | D9 | 109 | 1987 | 1 | - |
| 45 ALLEN STREET | D3 | 104 | 1973 | 0 | - |
| 10 RUTGERS STREET | D7 | 83 | 2001 | 1 | - |
| 148 MADISON STREET | RM | 80 | 2002 | 116 | $534k |
| 59 HENRY STREET | D6 | 80 | 2021 | 0 | - |